<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Speech-to-Text on René Zander | AI Automation Consultant</title><link>https://renezander.com/tags/speech-to-text/</link><description>Recent content in Speech-to-Text on René Zander | AI Automation Consultant</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://renezander.com/tags/speech-to-text/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Self-Hosted Voice AI: Why GDPR Is the Wrong Test (NIS2 Is the Real One)</title><link>https://renezander.com/blog/voice-ai-self-hosted-nis2-gdpr/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://renezander.com/blog/voice-ai-self-hosted-nis2-gdpr/</guid><description>&lt;p>Wednesday afternoon, a mid-cap manufacturer in the Netherlands. The Head of IT clicks &amp;ldquo;EU region&amp;rdquo; in the vendor dashboard and sees the green tick next to GDPR. The Data Processing Agreement is signed and filed. The board gets a green dot in its monthly compliance report.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Six weeks later the first supervisory notification lands under NIS2 Article 23: early warning within 24 hours. The voice vendor swapped a US subprocessor overnight. You did not know. The green dot wasn&amp;rsquo;t the test you thought it was.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Production Self-Hosted Voice AI Platform For Data-Residency-Sensitive Teams</title><link>https://renezander.com/case-studies/voice-ai-self-hosted-eu-vpc/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://renezander.com/case-studies/voice-ai-self-hosted-eu-vpc/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-problem">The problem&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Voice AI platforms like Parloa, Cognigy, Vapi, and Retell are useful, but enterprise teams often need more control than a hosted voice SaaS gives them. The recurring concerns:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Where does call data go?&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Can the system run in a trusted VPC?&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Can STT, LLM, and TTS providers be swapped?&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Can costs be controlled at scale?&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Can learnings from calls feed back into the business?&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Can the workflow be reviewed before changes reach production?&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="the-solution">The solution&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>A production-oriented self-hosted voice AI setup with operational control as the design centre:&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Voice AI in Production: From RunPod to Hosted Kubernetes</title><link>https://renezander.com/blog/voice-ai-production-kubernetes/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://renezander.com/blog/voice-ai-production-kubernetes/</guid><description>&lt;p>Your voice model works in a demo. The same model in production stalls under concurrent load. The model file is identical. So is the GPU card. Only the deployment changed.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>If your TTS service runs on a single RunPod pod, you&amp;rsquo;ve already met this wall. You handle one request per GPU at a time. A crash costs ninety seconds to reload the model. Failover isn&amp;rsquo;t in the setup. Your marketing page says &amp;ldquo;generate narration instantly.&amp;rdquo; Your infrastructure says &amp;ldquo;please form an orderly queue.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>